R&D Intelligence · ChipInsight

From technical challenges
to research planning

Searches patents, papers, company and technology information, verifies the evidence, and turns it into something usable straight away in research planning and IP-R&D decisions.

Request a demo See the product

Advanced Packaging/HBM4 TSV bonding Unified search across patents, papers and companies ⌘K Private JY

Today

IP-R&D briefing

Prior-art search

New technology monitoring

Technology and patent landscape

R&D

Performance and configuration benchmark

R&D opportunity discovery

Design-around scenarios

Business

Partners and licensing

IP-R&D full analysis report

Admin

Data and workspaces

Usage and billing

Admin console

Account settings

Design-around scenarios

Breaks the claim into its elements and compares alternatives that cut IP risk while holding performance and manufacturability.

Full analysis report

Active Scope Layered GaAs and GaAs nanosheet stripped therefrom showing 4

Reference patents 80 analyzable sample

Claim elements 4 0 fixed

Design alternatives 4 distinct design-around levers

Residual risk 23 Low

Reference patents Layered GaAs and GaAs nanosheet… → Target Layered GaAs → Design lever Remove the element

02 Element to design around 0 fixed

01 Layered GaAs

Essential function block

Keep High

02 Nanosheet release etch

Merge with the adjacent element

Keep High

03 GAA

Sequence and placement conditions

Keep Medium

04 nanosheet

Numeric and operating ranges

Keep Low

03 Layered GaAs design-around strategy lowest residual risk first

Low High Remove the element 23 Substitute the technology 38 Split the function 46 Change process conditions 58

04 Design-around planning report drafting 62%

01 Summary

02 Claim breakdown

03 Strategy comparison

04 Performance and manufacturability impact

05 Residual risk

03. Strategy comparison generated · 9 sources cited

Of the four design-around levers, Remove the elementcarries the lowest residual risk at 232. Removing Layered GaAs is directly tied to a loss in channel mobility, however, so7 performance must be validated first.

On manufacturability, Substitute the technologyrequires the least change to the existing line. Its residual risk of 38 is higher than removing the element, so we recommend carrying both options forward pending the performance results.4

Recommended lever

Remove the element

Residual risk

23 · low

Performance impact

Validation required

Manufacturability

Line change: medium

Lever comparison Claim coverage 9 sources

Agent Flow Anneal Model

Plan done

Collect done

Analyze 68%

Verify queue

How far does removing the Layered GaAs element reduce infringement exposure?

Copilot 22 sources

Residual risk drops to 58 → 23. The essential element of claim 1 is no longer reproduced, which makes literal infringement hard to establish.2

How much performance is lost?

Copilot verifying sources

Internal experiments from 2025-03 report a loss in channel mobility. One conflicting source is being re-checked

2 CN-113912112-A claim 1 element breakdown

7 Internal GAA channel mobility experiment, 2025-03

Compare manufacturability impact Recalculate alternative levers Add to the report

Ask about the analysis on this screen

Problem

Research planning stalls on
evidence, not material.

There is already enough material. The bottleneck is the time it takes to verify which of it actually supports a decision.

01 · Cause Material is abundant; verification is manual Search is fast, but opening each source and judging whether to trust it is still entirely human work.

02 · Knock-on The schedule slips to the back end Prior-art and design-around review arrive at the end of planning, forcing a reversal of direction.

03 · Result The reasoning does not survive Only the conclusion is written down; what it rested on is scattered across one person's memory.

Cumulative result The same research starts over on the next project

Product Experience

From search to conclusion
in three screens.

Research Workspace

Pose the problem and it gathers the evidence first.

Enter a research topic and it searches patents, papers and company information together, split across agents with different roles.

Unified search Agent role split Evidence tags

Collected

Documents collected 142

Verified sources 14

Related companies 9

Open questions 3

14 verified sources passed to comparison

Technology Comparison

Puts every technical alternative on the same basis.

Parameters, maturity, trade-offs and risk in one table, each entry carrying its source.

Parameter comparison Maturity Source attribution

Comparison

Cu–Cu Hybrid High

Micro-bump Medium

Solid-Liquid Low

Items compared 12

3 technical options passed to conclusions

Decision Pack

Ends in a form you can report from directly.

Summary, evidence, options, risks and open decisions, exported as one package.

Summary · evidence Options · risk Export

Output

Recommendation 1 of 3

Attached evidence 14

Risks 4

Open decisions 2

Confirmed as the basis for research planning and IP-R&D

Workflow

From question to judgment,
along one path.

01 Question Define the research problem

02 Search Patents · papers · companies

03 Analyze Technology comparison

04 Verify Evidence tracing

05 Output Decision Pack

Why Different

It leaves evidence, not just an answer.

NeuralChainX's four technical foundations work inside ChipInsight exactly as they do elsewhere.

Anneal

It searches in the domain's language

It carries the process, material and equipment terminology, so it finds the same concept however it is worded.

Agentic

It does not stop at finding

Agents with different roles split collection, comparison and verification, then cross-check the results.

Ontology

It reads the relationships between concepts

It follows the chain from technology to patent, material, process and equipment, cutting what gets missed.

Security

Nothing leaves your environment

Built on the assumption of private deployment and permission-based access.

Use Cases

Every role needs a different conclusion.

One set of evidence, branching into the deliverable each role needs.

14 verified sources One source set

Research planning Sets direction and priorities, with the evidence attached.

IP Runs prior-art search and design-around review on the same material.

Process engineering Compares workable technical alternatives parameter by parameter.

Management reporting Receives conclusions, risks and open decisions as one document.

From technical challenges
to research planning

Research planning stalls on
evidence, not material.

From search to conclusion
in three screens.

From question to judgment,
along one path.

It leaves evidence, not just an answer.

Every role needs a different conclusion.

Deployment chosen to fit
your security requirements.

Try it on one of your own
research problems first.

From technical challenges to research planning

Research planning stalls on evidence, not material.

From search to conclusion in three screens.

From question to judgment, along one path.

It leaves evidence, not just an answer.

Every role needs a different conclusion.

Deployment chosen to fit your security requirements.

Try it on one of your own research problems first.

From technical challenges
to research planning

Research planning stalls on
evidence, not material.

From search to conclusion
in three screens.

From question to judgment,
along one path.

Deployment chosen to fit
your security requirements.

Try it on one of your own
research problems first.